Friday, November 26, 2004

I am an objectivist!

I have realized after finishing Ayn Rand's novel The Fountainhead, that I am an objectivist. I am an objectivist simply because I like to be. Yes there is an objective reason behind this, but I don’t have to explain this to anybody since others opinions don’t matter to me. Yet, due to my own objective decision, I would let some of those reasons be known to you now.


It gives me absolute freedom. I can do anything I want and since anything I do is for my own interests and selfishness is a virtue, I am right in doing whatever I like. I don’t have to care for the society and in particular for those I don’t like (because they are always subjective). I have no responsibilities, barring what I choose to be comfortable for myself. It also gives me absolute freedom in my personal relations. I can make or break any relation without having to offer any explanations (just like Dominique does to Keating and later Wynand in the novel). I am correct in disobeying the government in many things, since it has no right to curtail my individual freedom. In particular I am correct in not paying my taxes, since taxation is only a means to benefit the poor by stealing from the rich. Above all I like this philosophy now because with some luck I am powerful in the society now and I don’t want to share the power with anyone, nor help anyone else to reach that place.


I do not care for the environment because I would make less profit if I care for it. And in any case my wealth insulates me from the environment with the use of technology and it is only the poor people who are going to suffer, with whom I don’t sympathize for any reason. In fact if somebody were to ask me about environmental concerns, inspired by some ideas in this book, I would answer them in the following way.


Are effects like global warming, not a result of our unrestrained exploitation of our environment?
Yes.
Then should this continue?
Yes.
Then what would happen to our environment? All of the land mass may be submerged soon. Where would we live?
Human genius has long found an answer for this. Using super-strong alloys, we construct entire cities suspended in air. We can grow vegetables and fruits using greenhouses, we can have even parks, resorts…
Who would provide the money for this?
Our great corporations will do.
Then, wouldn’t this be prohibitively expensive for our poor? Don’t they need to live?
Yes it will be too expensive for the poor. And yes they don’t need to live. The poor have no right to live. The poor remain poor because they are incompetent, lazy and dumb-headed[see speech by Dominque at pp.130]. In this world of survival of the fittest, they don’t deserve to live.


Of course I understand that there some moral issues which can’t be dealt with entirely rationally, and as long as they are not important to me, I’ll allow organizations like ARI to decide for me.


If these reasons don’t seem to be objective it is because I have chosen to disclose only some of my reasons and obviously my reasons can never be subjective because I am an objectivist which implies that I am a perfect man.


PS: If you haven’t got what I am saying, then look out for my review on “The Fountainhead” which I’ll post shortly. If you are getting it, then that is better – you would be able to enjoy my review much more!

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

I find it ironic that you present the argument in such a light. I0'd like to point out that Rand does not approve of actively hurting others for one's own benifit; she simply believes that it is not one's duty to help others who cannot help themselves. Therefore, damaging the enviromnent through global warming does not get the "Fountainhead seal of approval."

Anonymous said...

Wow! Dude you should just go die. I am serious go jump off a bridge or something like right now. What you are talking about is nothing more than greed and ignorance. If everyone thought like you we would just end up in another depression and NOBODY would have ANYTHING. And if people only did things for themselves eveyone would have to grow their own food because the farmer wouldnt care if anyone else had food or not, he can grow his own food. And what if you were that poor person? would you still believe that poor people have no right to live? Not all poor people are poor by choice.

sandee said...

i have a different opinion
http://wheniwentout.blogspot.com/2008/04/review-fountainhead-by-ayn-rand.html

reyt said...

We world of warcraft power leveling always archlord power leveling and flyff power levelingand flyff gold orflyff gold link 2moons gold or2moons dilwow knight online power leveling

Anonymous said...

Wow, Ayn Rand would be ashamed.

Anonymous said...

Enabling laws served to increase the amount of health insurance sold in states. http://insuranceinstates.com/ohio/Columbus/Safe%20Auto%20Group%20Inc/43213/

generic viagra online said...

I'm an objectivist too and I think I am a realistic guy, so this blog is one of the best in he category; very objective and you always are concern about the amount of information able in each line. It gives me absolute freedom, to use the same expression you wrote, we can share a lot of concepts together. j2j3

viagra said...

The Fountainhead received extremely mixed reviews when it was released. The New York Times' review of the novel named Rand "a writer of great power" who writes "brilliantly, beautifully and bitterly," and it stated that she had "written a hymn in praise of the individual... you will not be able to read this masterful book without thinking through some of the basic concepts of our time."

ox said...

Anonymous coward 2007 is probably dead today. Let's hope so.

Anonymous said...

You have a very good blog that the main thing a lot of interesting and useful! erectile dysfunction Read a useful article about tramadol tramadol

Anonymous said...

Thanks for the marvelous posting! I definitely enjoyed reading it, you might be a great author.I will make sure to bookmark your blog and definitely will come back very soon. I want to encourage continue your great posts, have a nice afternoon! greenteaweightlossslim.com

Anonymous said...

Your blog of Objectivism only reveals how ignorant you are to the philosophy. One of Ayn Rands main points is that you have the right to do what makes you happy, as long as it does not hurt anyone else. How is that not easy to understand and accept? Plus, it has been proven in studies, as well as in any person's life if they've had enough experience, that being hurtful to others either brings unhappiness to the offender, or is the result of the offender already being unhappy. And the opposite; being kind to others brings happiness, as well as mental and physical health benefits. And so correct morals can be explained and justified by the fact that they benefit everyone who lives by them. It's all about common sense and rationalism, you twat.